There are some interesting goings on these days in the courts, the halls of Congress, and the White House. We though we’d take a look at a few in this little posting. What, if anything, do they have in common? I’ll leave that for you to decide. On one level they speak to the absurdity of our times. On another, what do you expect from Beltway politics?
Issue the first is President Obama’s push to close certain tax loopholes says reward companies for shipping jobs overseas, and allow rich individuals to get even richer by not paying their fair share. This is most often accomplished by parking cash overseas. He says changes in tax laws, new reporting requirements, and a slew of new IRS agents can bring in $210 billion dollars over the next decade.
To hear big business and their friends in the conservative echo chamber tell it, making companies and individuals pay what they actually owe is a tax increase. They also say inhibiting their ability to duck taxes and ship jobs overseas will actually cost US jobs. Does anybody want to hold a tea party for these folks? If this is the best they can spin, lotsa luck! Trying to explain why changing tax laws to keep jobs here is a herculean task, at best.
Next up…the seemingly never ending race for a US Senate seat in Minnesota. When we last left Al Franken and Norm Coleman, Franken had won a major court victory, one which his supporters thought would finally gain him the seat for which he fought so hard. No such luck. Norm Coleman appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court, where the issue will hopefully be resolved sometime during Barack Obama’s first term.
But will it be resolved there? Republicans in the Senate, stung by the defection of Arlen Specter, now want Coleman to hold on for dear life and fight to the bitter end. That end would be the federal courts. While they don’t want their fingerprints on it, GOP senators are quietly promoting the federal option, perhaps all the way to the US Supreme Court. Coleman’s string of court defeats until now seems to mean nothing compared to the possibility of a filibuster proof senate. And caught in the middle is Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty. Does he sign off on Franken’s victory is the Minnesota Supreme Court rules he won the race? Stay tuned.
The final front in our theater of the bizarre comes from both the Supreme Court and the FCC. The Supremes, in a couple of recent decisions, have upheld the right of the commission to fine broadcasters for obscenity and indecency, even if it happens during a live broadcast through no fault of theirs. These rulings dealt with a couple of “F” bombs at awards shows, and Janet Jackson’s now famous wardrobe malfunction. Some may see this as a waste of time, but if the appointed overseers of all media want to make the nation safe from cuss words, more power to them.
However, there’s a fly in the ointment. One Virginia Congressman (and, reportedly, one Supreme Court Justice) are questioning how the FCC can go full force after obscenity while looking the other way at the those all too frequent ads for erectile dysfunction. They air at all times of the day, and trust me, you haven’t lived until you have to explain what “a sackful of pride” or “an erection lasting more than four hours” means to a young child.
Well, take heart. Rep. James Moran of Virginia feels your pain. He’s introduced HR 2175, the “Families for E.D. Advertising Decency Act”. The bill would deem such ads indecent, and therefore unable to air until after 10PM. Anybody want to wager the act won’t even get out of committee?
Yet such is the world in which we live. And all of the above are simple examples of your tax dollars at work.